My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only for
backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides the
commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support backward
compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show me
this?
Thanks.
-Cqlboy
I know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
> My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
> using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only
> for
> backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
> Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides
> the
> commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support
> backward
> compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show
> me
> this?
> Thanks.
> -Cqlboy
|||Thanx. Thought so. My fellow peers
are misinformed.
-Cqlboy
"Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
> I know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||I'm with Andrew. Ask your colleagues for a reference. It is easy to make claims you can't back up...
:-)
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
Blog: http://solidqualitylearning.com/blogs/tibor/
"Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B4044417-68A3-401F-B1AF-7BCE37AE1BC9@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Thanx. Thought so. My fellow peers
> are misinformed.
> -Cqlboy
> "Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
Showing posts with label compatability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label compatability. Show all posts
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Backward Compatability in Yukon using backup devices?
My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only for
backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides the
commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support backward
compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show me
this?
Thanks.
-CqlboyI know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
> My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
> using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only
> for
> backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
> Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides
> the
> commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support
> backward
> compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show
> me
> this?
> Thanks.
> -Cqlboy|||Thanx. Thought so. My fellow peers
are misinformed.
-Cqlboy
"Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
> I know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||I'm with Andrew. Ask your colleagues for a reference. It is easy to make cla
ims you can't back up...
:-)
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
Blog: http://solidqualitylearning.com/blogs/tibor/
"Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B4044417-68A3-401F-B1AF-7BCE37AE1BC9@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Thanx. Thought so. My fellow peers
> are misinformed.
> -Cqlboy
> "Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
>
using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only for
backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides the
commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support backward
compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show me
this?
Thanks.
-CqlboyI know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
> My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
> using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only
> for
> backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
> Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides
> the
> commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support
> backward
> compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show
> me
> this?
> Thanks.
> -Cqlboy|||Thanx. Thought so. My fellow peers
are misinformed.
-Cqlboy
"Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
> I know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||I'm with Andrew. Ask your colleagues for a reference. It is easy to make cla
ims you can't back up...
:-)
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
Blog: http://solidqualitylearning.com/blogs/tibor/
"Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B4044417-68A3-401F-B1AF-7BCE37AE1BC9@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Thanx. Thought so. My fellow peers
> are misinformed.
> -Cqlboy
> "Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
>
Backward Compatability in Yukon using backup devices?
My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only for
backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides the
commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support backward
compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show me
this?
Thanks.
-CqlboyI know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
> My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
> using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only
> for
> backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
> Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides
> the
> commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support
> backward
> compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show
> me
> this?
> Thanks.
> -Cqlboy|||Thanx. Thought so. My fellow peers
are misinformed.
-Cqlboy
"Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
> I know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
> > My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
> > using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only
> > for
> > backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
> >
> > Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides
> > the
> > commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support
> > backward
> > compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show
> > me
> > this?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -Cqlboy
>
>|||I'm with Andrew. Ask your colleagues for a reference. It is easy to make claims you can't back up...
:-)
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
Blog: http://solidqualitylearning.com/blogs/tibor/
"Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B4044417-68A3-401F-B1AF-7BCE37AE1BC9@.microsoft.com...
> Thanx. Thought so. My fellow peers
> are misinformed.
> -Cqlboy
> "Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
>> I know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
>> --
>> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>>
>> "Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
>> > My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
>> > using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only
>> > for
>> > backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
>> >
>> > Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides
>> > the
>> > commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support
>> > backward
>> > compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show
>> > me
>> > this?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > -Cqlboy
>>
using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only for
backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides the
commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support backward
compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show me
this?
Thanks.
-CqlboyI know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
> My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
> using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only
> for
> backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
> Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides
> the
> commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support
> backward
> compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show
> me
> this?
> Thanks.
> -Cqlboy|||Thanx. Thought so. My fellow peers
are misinformed.
-Cqlboy
"Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
> I know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
> > My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
> > using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only
> > for
> > backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
> >
> > Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides
> > the
> > commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support
> > backward
> > compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show
> > me
> > this?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -Cqlboy
>
>|||I'm with Andrew. Ask your colleagues for a reference. It is easy to make claims you can't back up...
:-)
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
Blog: http://solidqualitylearning.com/blogs/tibor/
"Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B4044417-68A3-401F-B1AF-7BCE37AE1BC9@.microsoft.com...
> Thanx. Thought so. My fellow peers
> are misinformed.
> -Cqlboy
> "Andrew J. Kelly" wrote:
>> I know nothing of dump devices going away any time soon.
>> --
>> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>>
>> "Cqlboy" <Cqlboy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:4332439A-418D-450F-BD94-5579374C40F3@.microsoft.com...
>> > My peers have informed me that I should no longer code my backup routine
>> > using a backup alias via sp_addumpdevice because it is 1) Provided only
>> > for
>> > backward compatability and 2) Will not be supported in the future.
>> >
>> > Should I not be using a backup alias for these reasons? Yukon provides
>> > the
>> > commands but no where have I seen where it's only there to support
>> > backward
>> > compatability and that it is targeted to be phased out. Can someone show
>> > me
>> > this?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > -Cqlboy
>>
backward compatability
Hi,
I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
sql2000?
thanks.
--
Paul G
Software engineer.Paul
No, it will not.
"Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> sql2000?
> thanks.
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.|||No.
Compatibility is forward only, typically for two versions. A SQL 7.0 backup
will restore to 2000 and 2005, but not 2008 (forthcoming).
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> sql2000?
> thanks.
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.|||Ok thanks for the information, I will use 2000 to build the dbase since we
are using both 2000 production/ 2005 testing(production in near future) .
--
Paul G
Software engineer.
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> No.
> Compatibility is forward only, typically for two versions. A SQL 7.0 backup
> will restore to 2000 and 2005, but not 2008 (forthcoming).
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>
> "Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> > Hi,
> > I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> > file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> > sql2000?
> > thanks.
> > --
> > Paul G
> > Software engineer.
>|||oops, someone asked the same question just a few posts earlier!
--
Paul G
Software engineer.
"Paul" wrote:
> Ok thanks for the information, I will use 2000 to build the dbase since we
> are using both 2000 production/ 2005 testing(production in near future) .
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.
>
> "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> > No.
> >
> > Compatibility is forward only, typically for two versions. A SQL 7.0 backup
> > will restore to 2000 and 2005, but not 2008 (forthcoming).
> >
> > --
> > Geoff N. Hiten
> > Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
> > Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> >
> >
> > "Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> > > Hi,
> > > I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> > > file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> > > sql2000?
> > > thanks.
> > > --
> > > Paul G
> > > Software engineer.
> >
> >
I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
sql2000?
thanks.
--
Paul G
Software engineer.Paul
No, it will not.
"Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> sql2000?
> thanks.
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.|||No.
Compatibility is forward only, typically for two versions. A SQL 7.0 backup
will restore to 2000 and 2005, but not 2008 (forthcoming).
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> sql2000?
> thanks.
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.|||Ok thanks for the information, I will use 2000 to build the dbase since we
are using both 2000 production/ 2005 testing(production in near future) .
--
Paul G
Software engineer.
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> No.
> Compatibility is forward only, typically for two versions. A SQL 7.0 backup
> will restore to 2000 and 2005, but not 2008 (forthcoming).
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>
> "Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> > Hi,
> > I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> > file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> > sql2000?
> > thanks.
> > --
> > Paul G
> > Software engineer.
>|||oops, someone asked the same question just a few posts earlier!
--
Paul G
Software engineer.
"Paul" wrote:
> Ok thanks for the information, I will use 2000 to build the dbase since we
> are using both 2000 production/ 2005 testing(production in near future) .
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.
>
> "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> > No.
> >
> > Compatibility is forward only, typically for two versions. A SQL 7.0 backup
> > will restore to 2000 and 2005, but not 2008 (forthcoming).
> >
> > --
> > Geoff N. Hiten
> > Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
> > Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> >
> >
> > "Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> > > Hi,
> > > I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> > > file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> > > sql2000?
> > > thanks.
> > > --
> > > Paul G
> > > Software engineer.
> >
> >
backward compatability
Hi,
I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
sql2000?
thanks.
Paul G
Software engineer.
Paul
No, it will not.
"Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> sql2000?
> thanks.
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.
|||No.
Compatibility is forward only, typically for two versions. A SQL 7.0 backup
will restore to 2000 and 2005, but not 2008 (forthcoming).
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> sql2000?
> thanks.
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.
|||Ok thanks for the information, I will use 2000 to build the dbase since we
are using both 2000 production/ 2005 testing(production in near future) .
Paul G
Software engineer.
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> No.
> Compatibility is forward only, typically for two versions. A SQL 7.0 backup
> will restore to 2000 and 2005, but not 2008 (forthcoming).
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>
> "Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
>
|||oops, someone asked the same question just a few posts earlier!
Paul G
Software engineer.
"Paul" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Ok thanks for the information, I will use 2000 to build the dbase since we
> are using both 2000 production/ 2005 testing(production in near future) .
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.
>
> "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
sql2000?
thanks.
Paul G
Software engineer.
Paul
No, it will not.
"Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> sql2000?
> thanks.
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.
|||No.
Compatibility is forward only, typically for two versions. A SQL 7.0 backup
will restore to 2000 and 2005, but not 2008 (forthcoming).
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I was just wondering if you build a database in sql2005 and then save the
> file(backup dbase) would it work to perform a restore from this file with
> sql2000?
> thanks.
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.
|||Ok thanks for the information, I will use 2000 to build the dbase since we
are using both 2000 production/ 2005 testing(production in near future) .
Paul G
Software engineer.
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> No.
> Compatibility is forward only, typically for two versions. A SQL 7.0 backup
> will restore to 2000 and 2005, but not 2008 (forthcoming).
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>
> "Paul" <Paul@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:60AF58FA-67EE-4AF7-94A9-4AC5B3E34732@.microsoft.com...
>
|||oops, someone asked the same question just a few posts earlier!
Paul G
Software engineer.
"Paul" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Ok thanks for the information, I will use 2000 to build the dbase since we
> are using both 2000 production/ 2005 testing(production in near future) .
> --
> Paul G
> Software engineer.
>
> "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)